高级搜索

FeCl3与接枝型淀粉改性絮凝剂联用“化学沉淀-絮凝”工艺除磷去浊性能

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

任杰, 高博强, 唐宇农, 李爱民, 杨琥. FeCl3与接枝型淀粉改性絮凝剂联用“化学沉淀-絮凝”工艺除磷去浊性能[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (11): 2988-2998. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020042106
引用本文: 任杰, 高博强, 唐宇农, 李爱民, 杨琥. FeCl3与接枝型淀粉改性絮凝剂联用“化学沉淀-絮凝”工艺除磷去浊性能[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (11): 2988-2998. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020042106
shu
REN Jie, GAO Boqiang, TANG Yunong, LI Aimin, YANG Hu. Removal of phosphorus and turbidity by a chemical sedimentation-flocculation process using FeCl3 combined with a graft starch-based flocculant[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (11): 2988-2998. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020042106
Citation: REN Jie, GAO Boqiang, TANG Yunong, LI Aimin, YANG Hu. Removal of phosphorus and turbidity by a chemical sedimentation-flocculation process using FeCl3 combined with a graft starch-based flocculant[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (11): 2988-2998. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2020042106
shu

FeCl3与接枝型淀粉改性絮凝剂联用“化学沉淀-絮凝”工艺除磷去浊性能

  • 南京大学环境学院, 污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 南京, 210023

    • 通讯作者: 杨琥, E-mail: yanghu@nju.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金（51778279）和水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2017ZX07602-001）资助.

Removal of phosphorus and turbidity by a chemical sedimentation-flocculation process using FeCl3 combined with a graft starch-based flocculant

  • State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    • Corresponding author: YANG Hu, yanghu@nju.edu.cn
  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51778279)and the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2017ZX07602-001).

  • 摘要: 过量的磷元素进入水体是引起水体富营养化的主要原因.本论文在传统化学沉淀除磷法基础上，采用"化学沉淀-絮凝"工艺，将氯化铁与一种接枝型阳离子淀粉改性絮凝剂（淀粉接枝共聚丙烯酰胺-聚甲基丙烯酰氧乙基三甲基氯化铵，St-AD）联合使用，分别在无机磷和有机磷模拟含浊废水中考察了其同时除磷及去浊性能.系统研究了天然高分子絮凝剂结构因素（电荷密度等）和环境因素（FeCl3与高分子絮凝剂投加量、pH、初始浊度以及初始总磷含量等）对上述基于FeCl3和淀粉改性絮凝剂联用的"化学沉淀-絮凝"工艺除磷去浊性能的影响.研究发现，相比于单独使用FeCl3化学沉淀除磷法，St-AD的加入使得铁盐投加量显著减少，同时形成的絮体尺寸更大，絮体结构也更为密实，进一步提高了除磷效果，同时也有效降低水体浊度；且一般情况下，St-AD阳离子取代度增高，处理效果增强；最佳工艺条件下，总磷和浊度去除率分别可达到98%和99%以上.此外，该组合工艺对有机磷模拟废水净化效果的提升优于对无机磷模拟废水.不同初始pH条件下实验结果表明，pH较高（pH>5）时该组合工艺的除磷去浊效果较好；本实验范围内初始浊度（30-300 NTU）对该组合工艺的除磷去浊效果影响较小；该"化学沉淀-絮凝"组合工艺对较高初始总磷含量（>20 mg·L-1）的模拟废水作用效果较差，该组合工艺不适于处理具有较高初始总磷含量的废水.由于该"化学沉淀-絮凝"组合工艺在除磷去浊中具有良好的性价比及环保特征，因此该工艺在水处理行业中应具有良好的应用前景.
    Abstract: Phosphorus has been considered the main trigger of eutrophication in water bodies. In this study, "chemical precipitation-flocculation" process has been used for simultaneous removal of phosphorus and turbidity on the basis of conventional "chemical precipitation" method. A cationic graft starch-based flocculant (Starch-graft-polyacrylamide-co-poly[(2-methacryloyloxyethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride], St-AD), as an assisting agent, was fed after the application of traditional inorganic precipitant of ferric chloride (FeCl3) to remove inorganic and organic phosphorus from their respective simulated turbid wastewaters. The effects of various influencing factors, including cationic content of St-AD, dosage, initial pH, initial turbidity, and initial total phosphorus (TP), were investigated systematically. This modified chemical sedimentation process assisted by St-AD not only evidently reduced the required dosage of FeCl3 but also obtained larger and denser flocs, causing a higher efficiency in removing TP and turbidity than conventional "chemical precipitation" method. Besides, St-AD with a higher cationic content showed better removal effectiveness. At optimal conditions, the removal extents of TP and turbidity were higher than 98% and 99%, respectively. This combination exhibited better efficiency in removing organic TP than in removing inorganic TP from water. In addition, the combined process had better TP and turbidity removal effect at higher initial pH (pH>5); the initial turbidity measured in this work (30-300 NTU) had little effect on the TP and turbidity removal; however, this combined technique was not suitable for treating higher initial TP wastewater (>20 mg·L-1). This "chemical precipitation-flocculation" process had a good application prospect in removal of phosphorus and turbidity in water and wastewater treatment plants due to its high cost performance and environmentally-friendly characteristics.
  • 加载中
  • [1] DANIEL J, CONLEY H W, PAERL R W, et al. Ecology controlling eutrophication:Nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Science, 2009, 323:1014-1015.
    [2] SCHINDLER D W, HECKY R E, FINDLAY D L, et al. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input:Results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105:11254-11258.
    [3] WITHERS P J A, JARVIE H P. Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers:A review[J]. Science of Total Environment, 2009, 400:379-395.
    [4] MINO T, VAN LOOSDRECHT M C M, HEIJNEN J J. Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process[J]. Water Research, 1998, 32:3193-3207.
    [5] FUHS G W, CHEN M. Microbiological basis of phosphate removal in the activated sludge process for the treatment of wastewater[J]. Microbial Ecology, 1975, 2(2):119-138.
    [6] SU Y, YANG W, SUN W, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous cerium-zirconium binary oxide nanoadsorbents by a solvothermal process and their effective adsorption of phosphate from water[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 268:270-279.
    [7] MEZENNER N Y, BENSMAILI A. Kinetics and thermodynamic study of phosphate adsorption on iron hydroxide-eggshell waste[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 147:87-96.
    [8] FERGUSON F J, KING T. A model for aluminum phosphate precipitation[J]. Water Pollution Control Federation. 1977, 49(4):646-658.
    [9] UENO Y, FUJII M. Three years experience of operating and selling recovered struvite from full-scale plant[J]. Environmental Technology, 2001, 22(11):1373-1381.
    [10] BARADA PRASANNA D, SANJEEV C. Electrochemical denitrification of simulated ground water[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(17):40665-4072.
    [11] HENZE M, HARREMOES P, LACOUR J. Wastewater treatment:Biological and chemical progress (Third edition)[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 2002.
    [12] MONTASTRUC L, AZZARO -PANTEL C, BISCANS B, et al. A thermochemical approach for calcium phosphate precipitation modeling in a pellet reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 94:41-50.
    [13] BARAT R, MONTOYA T, BORRAS L, et al. Interactions between calcium precipitation and the polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria metabolism[J]. Water Research, 2008, 42:3415-3424.
    [14] FERGUSON F J, KING T. A model for aluminum phosphate precipitation[J]. Water Pollution Control Federation, 1977, 4(49):646-658.
    [15] HINDALA A, STEWART J W. Chemical coagulation of effluents from municipal waste stabilization ponds[J]. Water and Sewage Works, 1971, 4(118):100-103.
    [16] LI C, MA J, SHEN J, et al. Removal of phosphate from secondary effluent with Fe2+ enhanced by H2O2 at nature pH/neutral pH[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(2/3):891-896.
    [17] 邢伟, 黄文敏, 李敦海, 等. 铁盐除磷技术机理及铁盐混凝剂的研究进展[J]. 给水排水, 2006, 32(2):88-91.

    XING W, HUANG W M, LI D H, et al. Research progress of iron salt dephosphorization mechanisms and iron salt coagulants[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2006, 32(2):88-91(in Chinese).

    [18] FYTIANOS K, VOUDRIAS E, RAIKOS N. Modelling of phosphorus removal from aqueous and wastewater samples using ferric iron[J]. Environmental Pollution, 1998, 101:123-130.
    [19] ZHOU Y, XING, X, LIU Z, et al. Enhanced coagulation of ferric chloride aided by tannic acid for phosphorus removal from wastewater[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(2):290-298.
    [20] REN J, LI N, WEI H, et al. Efficient removal of phosphorus from turbid water using chemical sedimentation by FeCl3 in conjunction with a starch-based flocculant[J]. Water Research, 2020, 170:115361.
    [21] CHU Y B, LI M, LIU J W, et al. Molecular insights into the mechanism and the efficiency-structure relationship of phosphorus removal by coagulation[J]. Water Research, 2018, 147:195-203.
    [22] JOO D J, SHIN W S, CHOI J H, et al. Decolorization of reactive dyes using inorganic coagulants and synthetic polymer[J]. Dyes Pigments, 2007, 73:59-64.
    [23] RENAULT F, SANCEY B, BADOT P M, et al. Chitosan for coagulation/flocculation processes-an eco-friendly approach[J]. European Polymer Journal, 2009, 45:1337-1348.
    [24] OKUDA T, NISHIJIMA W, SUGIMOTO, M, et al. Removal of coagulant aluminum from water treatment residuals by acid[J]. Water Research, 2014, 60:75-81.
    [25] BOLTO B, GREGORY J. Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41:2301-2324.
    [26] GUIBAL E, VAN VOOREN M, DEMPSEY, B A. A review of the use of chitosan for the removal of particulate and dissolved contaminants[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2006, 41:2487-2514.
    [27] YANG R, LI H, HUANG M, et al. A review on chitosan-based flocculants and their applications in water treatment[J]. Water Research, 2016, 95:59-89.
    [28] CAI T, LI H, YANG R, et al. Efficient flocculation of an anionic dye from aqueous solutions using a cellulose-based flocculant[J]. Cellulose, 2015, 22:1439-1449.
    [29] WU H, LIU Z, YANG H, et al. Evaluation of chain architectures and charge properties of various starch-based flocculants for flocculation of humic acid from water[J]. Water Research, 2016, 96:126-135.
    [30] YANG Z, YUAN B, LI H, et al. Amphoteric starch-based flocculants can flocculate different contaminants with even opposite surface charges from water through molecular structure control[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2014, 455:28-35.
    [31] DU Q, WEI H, LI A, et al. Evaluation of the starch-based flocculants on flocculation of hairwork wastewater[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601/602:1628-1637.
    [32] HUANG M, LIU Z, LI A, et al. Dual functionality of a graft starch flocculant:Flocculation and antibacterial performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 196:63-71.
    [33] LIU Z, WEI H, LI A, et al. Evaluation of structural effects on the flocculation performance of a co-graft starch-based flocculant[J]. Water Research, 2017, 118:160-166.
    [34] CHAKRABORTI R K, ATKINSON J F, VAN BENSCHOTEN J E. Characterization of alum floc by image analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2000, 34(18):3969-3976.
    [35] YANG Z, YUAN B, HUANG X, et al. Evaluation of the flocculation performance of carboxymethyl chitosan-graft polyacrylamide, a novel amphoteric chemically bonded composite flocculant[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46:107-114.
    [36] MANNING G S. Polyelectrolytes:Limiting laws for equilibrium and transport properties of polyelectrolyte solution[M]. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, 1974:9-37.
    [37] OOSAWA F. Polyelectrolytes[M]. New York:Marcel Dekker, 1971.
    [38] ROTT E, MINKE R, STEINMETZ H. Removal of phosphorus from phosphonate-loaded industrial wastewaters via precipitation/flocculation[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2017, 17:188-196.
    [39] CHUBAR N I, KANIBOLOTSKYY V A, STRELKO V V, et al. Adsorption of phosphate ions on novel inorganic ion exchangers[J]. Colloids Surface, 2005, 255:55-63.
    [40] ZHOU A M, TANG H X, WANG D S. Phosphorus adsorption on natural sediments:Modeling and effects of pH and sediment composition[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(7):1245-1254.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1842
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1842
  • PDF下载数:  37
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-21

FeCl3与接枝型淀粉改性絮凝剂联用“化学沉淀-絮凝”工艺除磷去浊性能

    通讯作者: 杨琥, E-mail: yanghu@nju.edu.cn
  • 南京大学环境学院, 污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 南京, 210023
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-21
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（51778279）和水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2017ZX07602-001）资助.

摘要: 过量的磷元素进入水体是引起水体富营养化的主要原因.本论文在传统化学沉淀除磷法基础上，采用"化学沉淀-絮凝"工艺，将氯化铁与一种接枝型阳离子淀粉改性絮凝剂（淀粉接枝共聚丙烯酰胺-聚甲基丙烯酰氧乙基三甲基氯化铵，St-AD）联合使用，分别在无机磷和有机磷模拟含浊废水中考察了其同时除磷及去浊性能.系统研究了天然高分子絮凝剂结构因素（电荷密度等）和环境因素（FeCl3与高分子絮凝剂投加量、pH、初始浊度以及初始总磷含量等）对上述基于FeCl3和淀粉改性絮凝剂联用的"化学沉淀-絮凝"工艺除磷去浊性能的影响.研究发现，相比于单独使用FeCl3化学沉淀除磷法，St-AD的加入使得铁盐投加量显著减少，同时形成的絮体尺寸更大，絮体结构也更为密实，进一步提高了除磷效果，同时也有效降低水体浊度；且一般情况下，St-AD阳离子取代度增高，处理效果增强；最佳工艺条件下，总磷和浊度去除率分别可达到98%和99%以上.此外，该组合工艺对有机磷模拟废水净化效果的提升优于对无机磷模拟废水.不同初始pH条件下实验结果表明，pH较高（pH>5）时该组合工艺的除磷去浊效果较好；本实验范围内初始浊度（30-300 NTU）对该组合工艺的除磷去浊效果影响较小；该"化学沉淀-絮凝"组合工艺对较高初始总磷含量（>20 mg·L-1）的模拟废水作用效果较差，该组合工艺不适于处理具有较高初始总磷含量的废水.由于该"化学沉淀-絮凝"组合工艺在除磷去浊中具有良好的性价比及环保特征，因此该工艺在水处理行业中应具有良好的应用前景.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (40)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心