种植竹荪后毛竹林土壤微生物生物量和微生物熵的动态变化

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101018

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 127-134.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101018

种植竹荪后毛竹林土壤微生物生物量和微生物熵的动态变化

夏捷¹^,²(), 陈胜¹, 吴一凡¹, 张玮¹, 谢锦忠¹^,^*()

1.中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所,浙江杭州 311400
2.南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2021-01-13 修回日期:2021-06-15 出版日期:2022-07-30 发布日期:2022-08-01
通讯作者: 谢锦忠
基金资助:
浙江省公益计划项目(LGN19C160002);宁波市科技计划项目(2019C10048);宁波市科技计划项目(2019B10020);浙江省省院合作林业科技项目(2020SY05);中央财政林业科技推广示范资金项目((2020)TS 17号)

Dynamic changes of soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy after planting Dictyophora indusiata in Phyllostachys edulis forests

XIA Jie¹^,²(), CHEN Sheng¹, WU Yifan¹, ZHANG Wei¹, XIE Jinzhong¹^,^*()

1. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Hangzhou 311400, China
2. College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2021-01-13 Revised:2021-06-15 Online:2022-07-30 Published:2022-08-01
Contact: XIE Jinzhong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】竹林下种植竹荪会对林地微生物活动产生影响,明确种植竹荪对毛竹林地土壤微生物生物量、微生物熵及其化学计量不平衡性的影响,揭示竹荪种植后毛竹林地土壤质量的变化,为竹-菌复合生态系统的经营提供参考。【方法】以未种植竹荪(CK)和竹荪收获完成时立即取样(T0),以及收获后1 a(T1)、2 a(T2)的林地土壤为研究对象,测定并分析不同处理林地土壤微生物生物量、微生物熵变化规律及其与土壤-微生物化学计量不平衡性间的耦合关系。【结果】与未种植竹荪林地相比,竹荪种植后林地土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN),土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷(MBC、MBN、MBP)含量和土壤微生物熵碳、氮、磷(q_MBC、q_MBN、q_MBP)总体上均明显升高,而土壤全磷(TP)含量显著降低。随竹荪收获后间隔时间的延长,土壤MBC含量和q_MBC呈降低趋势;土壤MBN含量和q_MBN均呈先明显降低后略升高趋势,而土壤SOC含量呈先显著降低后显著升高趋势;土壤TN、TP、MBP含量及q_MBP均呈先升高后降低趋势,T1土壤TN、TP、MBP含量及q_MBP显著高于T0和T2。土壤-微生物碳氮化学计量不平衡性(记为C_imb/N_imb)、碳磷化学计量不平衡性(记为C_imb/P_imb)和氮磷化学计量不平衡性(记为N_imb/P_imb)均以竹荪收获当年(T0)处理较低。MBC与MBN呈显著正相关,MBC、MBN与C_imb/N_imb、C_imb/P_imb均呈负相关,MBP与C_imb/P_imb、N_imb/P_imb呈正相关。【结论】种植竹荪后林地土壤质量短期内较未种植林地土壤有明显提升,种植竹荪可以改善毛竹林地土壤质量;竹荪刚收获后毛竹林地土壤质量最优,随着竹荪收获后间隔年份的增加,林地土壤质量呈现劣变趋势,且较未种植竹荪林地土壤质量差。

关键词: 毛竹林, 竹荪, 土壤微生物生物量, 土壤微生物熵, 土壤-微生物化学计量不平衡性

Abstract:

【Objective】 Dictyophora indusiata planted in a Phyllostachys edulis forest could influence the microbial activity of soil. The study aimed to reveal the changes in soil quality and provide a reference for the management of bamboo-fungus composite ecosystems by analyzing the effects of D. indusiata on the biomass, entropy and stoichiometry imbalance of soil microbia in a P. edulis forest. 【Method】 Using the soils of non-planted D. indusiata (CK) and those after 0 (T0), 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) years of D. indusiata harvest, the relationships among soil microbial biomass, microbial entropy, and soil-microbial stoichiometry imbalance were investigated in different treatments. 【Result】 The results indicated that the soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (MBC, MBN), and soil microbial entropy carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus (q_MBC, q_MBN, q_MBP) in T0, T1, T2 soils were significantly higher than those in the control, whereas the soil total phosphorus (TP) content was significantly lower than that in the control. Soil MBC and q_MBC gradually decreased with the increasing harvest time. Soil MBN and q_MBN initially decreased and then increased slightly, whereas soil SOC content initially decreased and then increased significantly; Soil TN, TP, MBP and q_MBP increased initially and then decreased. The TN, TP, MBP and q_MBP in T1 soil were significantly higher than those in T0 and T2 soils. The soil-microbial stoichiometry (C_imb/N_imb, C_imb/P_imb, N_imb/P_imb) of T0 had the lowest imbalance compared with the other periods. Soil MBC was positively correlated with MBN and both were negatively correlated with C_imb/N_imb and C_imb/P_imb. Soil MBP was positively correlated with C_imb/P_imb and N_imb/P_imb. 【Conclusion】 The soil quality of P. edulis forests was improved significantly in the short term after planting D. indusiata. However, the soil quality of P. edulis forests tends to deteriorate with the increasing annual gap after the harvest of D. indusiata, and the soil quality is worse than that of P. edulis forest without planting D. indusiata; The best soil quality in the P. edulis forest was observed just after the harvest of D. indusiata.

Key words: Phyllostachys edulis forest, Dictyophora indusiata, soil microbial biomass(SMB), soil microbial entropy, soil-microbia stoichiometry imbalance

中图分类号:

S718.5

夏捷,陈胜,吴一凡,等. 种植竹荪后毛竹林土壤微生物生物量和微生物熵的动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 127-134.

XIA Jie, CHEN Sheng, WU Yifan, ZHANG Wei, XIE Jinzhong. Dynamic changes of soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy after planting Dictyophora indusiata in Phyllostachys edulis forests[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(4): 127-134.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101018.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 33

[1]	PASCUAL J A, GARCIA C, HERNANDEZ T, et al. Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32(13):1877-1883. DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00161-9.
[2]	CARAVACA F, ALGUACIL M M, FIGUEROA D, et al. Re-establishment of Retama sphaerocarpa as a target species for reclamation of soil physical and biological properties in a semiarid Mediterranean area[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 182(1/2/3):49-58. DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00067-7.
[3]	吴秀芝, 刘秉儒, 阎欣, 等. 荒漠草地土壤微生物生物量和微生物熵对沙漠化的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8):2691-2698.
	WU X Z, LIU B R, YAN X, et al. Response of soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy to desertification in desert grassland[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(8):2691-2698.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201908.009.
[4]	ROGERS B F, TATE R L III. Temporal analysis of the soil microbial community along a toposequence in pineland soils[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2001, 33(10):1389-1401. DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00044-X.
[5]	魏媛, 张金池, 喻理飞. 退化喀斯特植被恢复过程中土壤微生物生物量碳的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(5):71-75.
	WEI Y, ZHANG J C, YU L F. Changes of soil microbial biomass carbon along successional processes of degraded Karst vegetation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2008, 32(5):71-75.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2008.05.016.
[6]	SRIVASTAVA S C, SINGH J S. Microbial C,N and P in dry tropical forest soils:effects of alternate land-uses and nutrient flux[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1991, 23(2):117-124. DOI:10.1016/0038-0717(91)90122-Z.
[7]	ANDERSON T H. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to asses soil quality[J]. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2003, 98(1/2/3):285-293. DOI:0.1016/S0167-8809(03)00088-4.
[8]	SPARLING G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter[J]. Soil Res, 1992, 30(2):195.DOI:10.1071/sr9920195.
[9]	胡宗达, 刘世荣, 刘兴良, 等. 川西亚高山天然次生林不同演替阶段土壤-微生物生物量及其化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(12):4900-4912.
	HU Z D, LIU S R, LIU X L, et al. Soil and soil microbial biomass contents and C:N:P stoichiometry at different succession stages of natural secondary forest in subalpine area of western Sichuan,China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(12):4900-4912.DOI:10.5846/stxb202008202170.
[10]	周正虎, 王传宽. 生态系统演替过程中土壤与微生物碳氮磷化学计量关系的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12):1257-1266.
	ZHOU Z H, WANG C K. Changes of the relationships between soil and microbes in carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry during ecosystem succession[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(12):1257-1266.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0218.
[11]	MOOSHAMMER M, WANEK W, ZECHMEISTER-BOLTENSTERN S, et al. Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and their resources:mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to their resources[J]. Front Microbiol, 2014, 5:22.DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022.
[12]	MÜLLER M, OELMANN Y, SCHICKHOFF U, et al. Himalayan treeline soil and foliar C:N:P stoichiometry indicate nutrient shortage with elevation[J]. Geoderma, 2017, 291:21-32.DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.12.015.
[13]	冯杰, 冯娜, 刘艳芳, 等. 面向规模化应用的竹荪多糖液态深层发酵工艺优化[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(2):181-187.
	FENG J, FENG N, LIU Y F, et al. Optimization of medium components for large-scale production of intracellular polysaccharides from Dictyophora indusiata in submerged fermentation[J]. Food Sci, 2020, 41(2):181-187.DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20181101-014.
[14]	彭超, 艾文胜, 谢韵帆, 等. 竹基质与菌种密度对棘托竹荪产量及营养品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(6):1100-1107.
	PENG C, AI W S, XIE Y F, et al. Effect of bamboo sawdust substrate and strain planting density to yield and nutritional quality of Dictyophora echinovolvata[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2020, 41(6):1100-1107.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.06.005.
[15]	苏德伟, 林辉, 林春梅, 等. 不同生长时期竹荪覆土层土壤微生物、理化性质及其酶活性的变化研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(3):1170-1174.
	SU D W, LIN H, LIN C M, et al. Study on changes of microorganisms,physicochemical property and enzyme activities about soil over Dictyophora indusiata at different growth stages[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2014, 27(3):1170-1174.DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2014.03.066.
[16]	卢鹏, 谢锦忠, 童龙, 等. 麻竹林下竹荪仿野生种植关键技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(4):177-182.
	LU P, XIE J Z, TONG L, et al. Study on the wild imitation cultivation technique for Dictyophora indusiata in Dendrocalamus latiflorus stands[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 40(4):177-182.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.04.028.
[17]	白会超. 不同竹基料配方对竹荪产量和品质影响的研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2015.
	BAI H C. The study of effects of different bamboo base formula on the yield and quality of Dictyophora[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015.
[18]	常颖萃, 蒋文静, 石妍, 等. 竹荪不同生育期土壤微生物动态变化[J]. 热带作物学报, 2013, 34(7):1228-1231.
	CHANG Y C, JIANG W J, SHI Y, et al. Dynamic change of soil microorganisms at various growing stage of Dictyophora[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2013, 34(7):1228-1231.
[19]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2000.
[20]	张利青, 彭晚霞, 宋同清, 等. 云贵高原喀斯特坡耕地土壤微生物量C、N、P空间分布[J]. 生态学报, 2012(7):2056-2065.
	ZHANG L Q, PENG W X, SONG T Q, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil microbial biomass carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus in sloping farmland in a Karst region on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012(7):2056-2065.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201108171204.
[21]	SHAO Y H, XIE Y X, WANG C Y, et al. Effects of different soil conservation tillage approaches on soil nutrients,water use and wheat-maize yield in rainfed dry-land regions of north China[J]. Eur J Agron, 2016, 81:37-45.DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.014.
[22]	赵睿宇, 李正才, 王斌, 等. 毛竹林地表稻草覆盖后翻耕对土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(8):2118-2126.
	ZHAO R Y, LI Z C, WANG B, et al. Effects of straw mulching and scarification on soil labile organic carbon pool in a Phyllostachys edulis plantation[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(8):2118-2126.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201708.016.
[23]	徐阳春, 沈其荣, 冉炜. 长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(1):83-90.
	XU Y C, SHEN Q R, RAN W. Effects of zero-tillage and application of manure on soil microbial biomass C,N and P after sixteen years of cropping[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2002, 39(1):83-90.DOI:10.11766/trxb200103110113.
[24]	SPEDDING T A, HAMEL C, MEHUYS G R, et al. Soil microbial dynamics in maize-growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2004, 36(3):499-512.DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.10.026.
[25]	汤宏, 沈健林, 张杨珠, 等. 秸秆还田与水分管理对稻田土壤微生物量碳、氮及溶解性有机碳、氮的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(1):240-246.
	TANG H, SHEN J L, ZHANG Y Z, et al. Effect of rice straw incorporation and water management on soil microbial biomass carbon,nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon,nitrogen in a rice paddy field[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2013, 27(1):240-246.DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2013.01.045.
[26]	徐华勤, 肖润林, 宋同清, 等. 稻草覆盖与间作三叶草对丘陵茶园土壤微生物群落功能的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(2):166-174.
	XU H Q, XIAO R L, SONG T Q, et al. Effects of mulching and intercropping on the functional diversity of soil microbial communities in tea plantations[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2008, 16(2):166-174.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2008.02.009.
[27]	张奇, 陈粲, 陈效民, 等. 不同深度秸秆还田对黄棕壤氮素和微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(2):56-61.
	ZHANG Q, CHEN C, CHEN X M, et al. Effects of straw returning to different soil depths on soil nitrogen and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in yellow brown soil[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 39(2):56-61.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.009
[28]	SCHNÜRER J, ROSSWALL T. Mineralization of nitrogen from ¹⁵N labelled fungi,soil microbial biomass and roots and its uptake by barley plants[J]. Plant Soil, 1987, 102(1):71-78.DOI:10.1007/BF02370903.
[29]	崔纪超, 毛艳玲, 杨智杰, 等. 土壤微生物生物量磷研究进展[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2008, 3(4):80-89.
	CUI J C, MAO Y L, YANG Z J, et al. Advances in soil microbial biomass phosphorus[J]. J Subtrop Resour Environ, 2008, 3(4):80-89.DOI:10.19687/j.cnki.1673-7105.2008.04.011.
[30]	任天志. 持续农业中的土壤生物指标研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(1):68-75.
	REN T Z. Soil bioindicators in sustainable agriculture[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2000, 33(1):68-75.
[31]	唐海明, 李超, 肖小平, 等. 有机肥氮投入比例对双季稻田根际土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和微生物熵的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1335-1343.
	TANG H M, LI C, XIAO X P, et al. Effects of different manure nitrogen input ratio on rhizosphere soil microbial biomass carbon,nitrogen and microbial quotient in double-cropping rice field[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(4):1335-1343.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.014.
[32]	SINGH J S, RAGHUBANSHI A S, SINGH R S, et al. Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna[J]. Nature, 1989, 338: 499-500. DOI:10.1038/338499a0.
[33]	陈安娜, 王光军, 陈婵, 等. 亚热带不同林龄杉木林叶-根-土氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(11):4027-4036.
	CHEN A N, WANG G J, CHEN C, et al. Variation in the N and P stoichiometry of leaf-root-soil during stand development in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in subtropical China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(11):4027-4036.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201707141278.

处理treatment	q_MBC	q_MBN	q_MBP	C_imb/N_imb	C_imb/P_imb	N_imb/P_imb
CK	2.80±0.13 c	17.04±0.60 c	6.38±0.16 d	6.09±0.21 b	2.28±0.06 c	0.37±0.01 b
T0	5.57±0.19 a	33.10±1.37 a	10.05±0.78 c	5.94±0.05 b	1.80±0.10 d	0.30±0.02 c
T1	4.81±0.26 b	16.01±0.43 c	14.12±1.09 a	3.34±0.27 c	2.95±0.38 b	0.88±0.04 a
T2	2.96±0.09 c	27.71±0.71 b	11.44±0.54 b	9.37±0.52 a	3.87±0.29 a	0.41±0.01 b

参数 parameter	SOC	TN	TP	MBC	MBN	MBP	q_MBC	q_MBN	q_MBP	C_imb/N_imb	C_imb/P_imb
TN	0.208
TP	-0.769^**	-0.415
MBC	0.203	0.480	-0.751^**
MBN	0.792^**	-0.001	-0.890^**	0.646^*
MBP	0.077	0.946^**	-0.202	0.230	-0.214
q_MBC	0.050	0.487	-0.644^*	0.987^**	0.419	0.257
q_MBN	0.752^**	-0.134	-0.828^**	0.487	0.991^**	-0.340	0.361
q_MBP	0.339	0.961^**	-0.530	0.458	0.134	0.937^**	0.443	0.003
C_imb/N_imb	0.697^*	-0.416	-0.195	-0.450	-0.493	-0.393	-0.579^*	0.534	-0.262
C_imb/P_imb	0.486	0.389	-0.054	-0.460	-0.047	0.544	-0.523	-0.111	0.499	0.499
N_imb/P_imb	-0.298	0.825^**	0.121	0.132	-0.543	0.917^**	0.214	-0.647^*	0.747^**	-0.656^*	0.324

参数 parameter	PC1	PC2	PC3
SOC	0.150	-0.029	-0.217
TN	0.137	-0.149	0.109
TP	-0.173	-0.070	0.024
MBC	0.133	0.127	0.178
MBN	0.152	0.122	-0.098
MBP	0.098	-0.206	0.086
q_MBC	0.118	0.130	0.222
q_MBN	0.138	0.147	-0.111
q_MBP	0.148	-0.141	0.057
C_imb/N_imb	-0.033	0.387	0.039
C_imb/P_imb	-0.044	0.213	0.193
N_imb/P_imb	-0.031	0.217	-0.195
特征根 characteristic polynomial	5.552	3.940	2.508
贡献率/% contribution rate	46.268	32.835	20.897
累计贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate	46.268	79.103	100.000

处理 treatment	PC1	排名 rank	PC2	排名 rank	PC3	排名 rank	PC	综合排名 rank
T0	0.70	1	1.28	1	0.35	2	0.82	1
T1	0.36	3	-1.06	4	1.00	1	0.03	2
T2	0.42	2	-0.44	3	-1.37	4	-0.24	3
CK	-1.48	4	0.22	2	0.03	3	-0.61	4

种植竹荪后毛竹林土壤微生物生物量和微生物熵的动态变化

Dynamic changes of soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy after planting Dictyophora indusiata in Phyllostachys edulis forests

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	赵爽, 王邵军, 杨波, 左倩倩, 曹乾斌, 王平, 张路路, 张昆凤, 樊宇翔. 西双版纳热带森林碳循环中土壤呼吸对次生演替的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 12-18.
[2]	童龙, 李红艳, 刘小明, 李彬, 陈丽洁, 陈桂兰, 曾小英, 耿养会. 不同栽培基料对竹荪农艺性状和主要营养成分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 30-36.
[3]	郭传阳, 林开敏, 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 李茂, 郑宏, 游云飞, 陈志云. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 125-131.
[4]	王茜,王成2,杜万光,许超,郭珺琪. 福州旗山夏季毛竹林生态保健功能研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(02): 120-126.
[5]	宋蕾,林尤伟,金光泽. 模拟氮沉降对典型阔叶红松林土壤微生物群落特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(05): 7-12.
[6]	陈霜霜,秦鹏,顾琪,王舒悰,洪为,时培建,王福升. 景观交错对毛竹林生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(04): 95-100.
[7]	倪雪,张焕朝,杨秀莲,王良桂. 覆盖物对土壤性质及微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(01): 89-95.
[8]	周之栋,卜晓莉,吴永波,薛建辉. 生物炭对土壤微生物特性影响的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 59(06): 1-8.
[9]	卢鹏,谢锦忠,童龙,王玲,陈丽洁,张玮,耿养会,吕玉奎. 麻竹林下竹荪仿野生种植关键技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 59(04): 177-182.
[10]	卢晓强,杨万霞,奚月明,丁访军. 喀斯特地区不同植被恢复类型对土壤化学及微生物生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 58(05): 73-80.
[11]	葛之葳,彭塞,许凯,徐钰,于水强,阮宏华,徐长柏,曹国华. 短期氮添加对杨树人工林表层土壤可溶性有机碳的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 57(06): 23-27.
[12]	徐涵湄,阮宏华. 雪灾对武夷山毛竹林凋落物分解和养分释放的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 56(06): 69-72.
[13]	刘广路,范少辉,刘蔚漪,杜满义. 闽北不同类型毛竹林水量平衡[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 56(03): 41-46.
[14]	刘蔚漪，范少辉，刘广路，郭宝华1，余林，陈孝丑. 闽北不同类型毛竹林冠层降水再分配特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 54(04): 63-66.
[15]	姜艳，王兵，汪玉如. 江西大岗山毛竹林土壤呼吸时空变异及模型模拟[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 53(06): 47-52.