中国全科医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (16): 2028-2033.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.202

所属专题: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合集 社区卫生服务最新研究合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于BCDS项目的社区卫生服务中心糖尿病患者门诊费用研究

徐楠1,王梅1*,刘晓东2,顾雪非1,李婷婷1,袁申元3*,袁明霞3   

  1. 1.100044北京市,国家卫生健康委卫生发展研究中心健康保障部 2.999077香港特别行政区,香港大学李嘉诚医学院 3.100730北京市,北京同仁医院内分泌科
    *通信作者:王梅,研究员;E-mail:wangmei1953@aliyun.com 袁申元,主任医师;E-mail:zfsxia@126.com
  • 出版日期:2021-06-05 发布日期:2021-06-05

Outpatient Expenses among Diabetic Patients Treated in Community Health Centers:an Investigation based on BCDS 

XU Nan1,WANG Mei1*,LIU Xiaodong2,GU Xuefei1,LI Tingting1,YUAN Shenyuan3*,YUAN Mingxia3   

  1. 1.Department of Health Security Research,China National Health Development Research Center,Beijing 100044,China
    2.LKS Faculty of Medicine the University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China
    3.Department of Endocrinology,Beijing Tongren Hospital,Beijing 100730,China
    *Corresponding authors:WANG Mei,Professor;E-mail:wangmei1953@aliyun.com
    YUAN Shenyuan,Chief physician;E-mail:zfsxia@126.com
  • Published:2021-06-05 Online:2021-06-05

摘要: 背景 北京同仁医院在社区开展为期十年三个阶段糖尿病规范化管理,对患者进行规范化、连续性跟踪管理。患者接受长期管理后,实际产生的效果是否具有经济效益和社会效益,尚未开展实证性卫生经济学评估。目的 选取部分社区开展实地调研,了解在接受管理的社区中,糖尿病患者的社区各年度门诊费用情况(真实世界数据)。方法 根据项目实际情况,干预项目前两个阶段的社区中,对其中9个社区参加项目的患者随机抽取30%的人员,自2016年11月起对其开展为期10个月的卫生经济学费用现场调查,分别调取入组患者2012、2014、2016年在社区卫生服务中心门诊就诊时产生的药品、检查等费用数据,对各年份费用数据通过Kruskal-Wallis H检验和描述性研究,对费用结构及用药情况等开展描述性研究。结果 经消涨处理后,2012、2014、2016年人均门诊费用为10 312.9、10 885.6、11 733.5元。结构分析中糖尿病诊疗费用糖尿病防治相关用药的整体年消耗水平为4 690.4~5 251.9元,约占年人均费用水平的44.76%~45.48%,其他费用和中药费用两者占据了近半数(47.31%~48.34%)。结论 本干预模式下患者的用药情况和年度费用水平整体处于平稳状态,间接说明接受干预管理的糖尿病患者病况整体相对稳定;费用结构存在部分不合理,其他费用和中药费用两者的占比和增速存在一定的问题。建议建立主要慢性病病种的结构性精细化支付标准。在门诊慢性病支付方面,设立和控制辅助性用药的占比,并进一步分析辅助性中成药支出和其他支出的内涵,重新制定其相对合理的可支出占比。

关键词: 糖尿病, 社区卫生服务中心, 门诊费用, 费用结构, 医疗保障

Abstract: Background Beijing Tongren Hospital has carried out a 10-year three-stage standardized community-based diabetes management program(hereinafter referred to as BCDS),aiming to provide community-dwelling diabetic patients with standardized and continuous follow-up management services. After long-term management,whether the actual effect has economic and social benefits has not been evaluated by empirical health economics. Objective To understand the annual outpatient diabetes care expenses in community health centers(CHCs) by analyzing the real-world data collected via a field investigation in CHCs implementing the BCDS. Methods We conducted a field investigation for 10 consecutive months since November 2016 using health economics method in 9 of the CHCs who have implemented the first and second stages of the Tongren diabetes program. One third of the diabetic patients receiving the program management were selected randomly,and data about their outpatient expenses in 2012,2014 and 2016,including drug and examination expenses,were collected. Kruskal-Wallis test and descriptive research were used to analyze the annual expenses. Descriptive research was conducted to analyze the cost of structure and drug use. Results After adjusting for inflation,the annual outpatient expenses per capita were 10 312.91,10 885.56,and 11 733.50 yuan,respectively. The analysis of cost of structure found that,the annual cost of diabetes prevention and treatment related drugs ranged from 4 690.37 to 5 251.85 yuan,accounting for around 44.76%-45.48% of the annual expenses per capita. Traditional Chinese medicine expenses and other expenses accounted for nearly half of the total,about 47.31%-48.34%. Conclusion With the interventions of Tongren diabetes program,the drug use and annual outpatient expenses of diabetic patients are generally stable,indirectly indicating that the overall conditions of the intervened patients are relatively stable. The structure of the cost is partial irrationally,such as the proportion and growth rate of traditional Chinese medicine expenses and other expenses are not ideal,and use of too many types of Chinese patent medicines,and the ranking of the top 10 drugs(because their prophylactic and anti-diabetic effects are still unclear),which needs further improved. In view of this,we put forward the following recommendations: developing a structured and refined payment system for major chronic diseases;in terms of outpatient chronic disease payment,appropriately determining and controlling the proportion of expenses of auxiliary therapies;reasonably modifying the proportions of expenses of Chinese patent medicines as auxiliary therapies and other expenditures based on deeply analyzing their meanings.

Key words: Diabetes, Community health center, Outpatient expense, Cost structure, Medical security