中国全科医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (36): 4476-4481.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.672

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生自测健康状况及其影响因素研究

杨秀兰*,王婉露,吴萌,余皖婉   

  1. 230032安徽省合肥市,安徽医科大学人文医学学院
    *通信作者:杨秀兰,教授;E-mail:395311575@qq.com
  • 出版日期:2019-12-20 发布日期:2019-12-20
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省大学生社会实践基地建设项目(2015 Szzgjh3-6);国家级大学生创新训练项目(201810366016)——大学生健康状况与健康公平关系研究

Self-rated Health Status and Influencing Factors in College Students 

YANG Xiulan*,WANG Wanlu,WU Meng,YU Wanwan   

  1. School of Humanistic Medicine,Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230032,China
    *Corresponding author:YANG Xiulan,Professor;E-mail:395311575@qq.com
  • Published:2019-12-20 Online:2019-12-20

摘要: 背景 实施健康中国战略,必须提高全民健康水平。大学生健康状况关系到民族昌盛和国家富强,是值得高度关注的重要课题。目的 调查当前我国大学生自测健康状况,并分析其影响因素。方法 2018年5—7月,采用多阶段分层整群抽样法抽取全国11所高校的3 000名大学生为调查对象,采用自行设计的《大学生自测健康评定调查问卷》进行现场调查,内容包括社会人口学资料(性别、专业、家庭所在地、父母学历、父母职业阶层、家庭经济状况、家庭社会地位、是否为贫困生)、自评健康评定量表(SRHMS V1.0,包含生理、心理、社会健康子量表)。采用多元线性回归分析探讨大学生SRHMS V1.0各子量表得分及其总分的影响因素。结果 共发放问卷3 000份,回收有效问卷2 870份,有效回收率为95.67%。大学生SRHMS V1.0总分为(66.56±6.13)分,生理健康子量表得分为(76.14±7.12)分,心理健康子量表得分为(54.10±6.27)分,社会健康子量表得分为(68.55±14.52)分。多元线性回归分析结果显示,性别(β=0.767)、家庭社会地位(β=1.542)是大学生生理健康子量表得分的影响因素(P<0.05);性别(β=-0.827)、母亲职业阶层(β=-0.582)、家庭社会地位(β=0.864)、家庭经济状况(β=0.758)是大学生心理健康子量表得分的影响因素(P<0.05);性别(β=1.350)、父亲学历(β=-0.842)、家庭社会地位(β=5.431)、家庭经济状况(β=2.966)、是否为贫困生(β=-1.863)是大学生社会健康子量表得分的影响因素(P<0.05);母亲职业阶层(β=-0.454)、家庭社会地位(β=2.292)、家庭经济状况(β=1.033)是大学生SRHMS V1.0总分的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 大学生自测健康状况总体处于一般水平。应重点关注不同性别、父母学历不同、父母职业阶层不同、家庭经济状况不同、家庭社会地位不同、是否为贫困生的大学生,并采取多样化健康管理服务、团体辅导干预等方式来有效提升大学生整体健康水平。

关键词: 健康状况, 大学, 学生, 健康调查, 影响因素分析

Abstract: Background To achieve the goals towards building a healthy China,it is necessary to improve the health of all Chinese.College students,a group plays a role in promoting the prosperity of the nation and the country,whose health status deserves high level of focus.Objective To investigate the self-rated health status and influencing factors in college students of China.Methods From May to July 2018,3 000 college students from 11 universities in China were sampled by multi-stage stratified cluster sampling,and were surveyed in a face-to-face manner with a self-designed questionnaire,Self-rated Health Assessment for College Students,covering social demographic data(gender,major,household location,parental education level,parental occupational class,family economic status,family social status,financially strapped status),and the health status assessed by The Self-rated Health Measurement Scale(Version 1.0)(SRHMS V1.0) consisting of physiological,psychological and social health subscales.The influencing factors of the scale and subscale scores of the SRHMS V1.0 were explored by multiple linear regression analysis.Results The survey obtained a response rate of 95.67%
(2 870/3 000).The mean scale score for the SRHMS V1.0 was(66.56±6.13),and the mean scores for its physiological health,mental health social health subscales were(76.14±7.12)(54.10±6.27)(68.55±14.52),respectively.Multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender(β=0.767) and family social status(β=1.542) were associated with the score of the physiological health subscale(P<0.05).Gender(β=-0.827),mother's occupational class(β=-0.582),family social status(β=0.864),and family economic status(β=0.758) were associated with the score of the mental health subscale(P<0.05).Gender(β=1.350),father's education level(β=0.842),family social status(β=5.431),family economic status(β=2.966),and whether financially strapped(β=-1.863) were associated with the score of the social health subscale(P<0.05).Mother's occupational class(β=-0.454),family social status(β=2.292),and family economic status(β=1.033) were associated with the scale score of the SRHMS V1.0(P<0.05).Conclusion On the whole,the self-rated health status in college students is fair.To improve the overall health status in this group effectively,it is essential to deliver diversified health management services and group counseling interventions,with special attention paid to sex,parental education level,parental occupational class,family economic status,family social status and financially strapped status.

Key words: Health status, Universities, Students, Health surveys, Root cause analysis