Skip to main content
Log in

Addiction as a dynamical rationality disorder

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China

Abstract

Addiction is frequently modeled as a behavioral disorder resulting from the internal battle between two subsystems: one model describes slow planning versus fast habitual action; another, hot versus cold modes. In another model, one subsystem pushes the individual toward substance abuse, while the other tries to pull him away. These models all describe one side winning over the other at each point of confrontation, represented as a simple binary switch: on or off, win or lose. We propose however, an alternative model, in which opposing systems work in parallel, tipping toward one subsystem or the other, in greater or lesser degree, based on a continuous rationality factor. Our approach results in a dynamical system that qualitatively emulates seeking behavior, cessation, and relapse—enabling the accurate description of a process that can lead to recovery. As an adjunct to the model, we are in the process of creating an associated, interactive website that will enable addicts to journal their thoughts, emotions and actions on a daily basis. The site is not only a potentially rich source of data for our model, but will in its primary function aid addicts to individually identify parameters affecting their decisions and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. NSDUH Series H-34, DHHS Publication No. SMA 08-4343, 2008

  2. Kreek M J, Nielsen D A, Butelman E R, LaForge K S. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nature Neuroscience, 2005, 8(11): 1450–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Volkow N D, Fowler J S, Wang G J. The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology, 2004, 47(Suppl 1): 3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones A M. Health, addiction, social interaction and the decision to quit smoking. Journal of Health Economics, 1994, 13(1): 93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kleber H D, Weissman M M, Rounsaville B J, Wilber C H, Prusoff B A, Riordan C E. Imipramine as treatment for depression in addicts. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1983, 40(6): 649–653

    Google Scholar 

  6. Redish A D. Addiction as a computational process gone awry. Science, 2004, 306(5703): 1944–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heyman G M. Addiction: a Disorder of Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soria G, Barbano M F, Maldonado R, Valverde O. A reliable method to study cue-, priming-, and stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine self-administration in mice. Psychopharmacology, 2008, 199(4): 593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson P M, Kenny P J. Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nature Neuroscience, 2010, 13(5): 635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander B K. “The Myth of Drug-Induced Addiction”, a paper delivered to the Canadian Senate, 2001

  11. Dockner E J, Feichtinger G. Cyclical consumption patterns and rational addiction. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(1): 256–263

    Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein D H, Willner-Reid J, Vahabzadeh M, Mezghanni M, Lin J L, Preston K L. Real-time electronic diary reports of cue exposure and mood in the hours before cocaine and heroin craving and use. Archives of General Psychiatry, 2009, 66(1): 88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein R Z, Volkow N D. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2002, 159(10): 1642–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McClure S M, Daw N D, Montague P R. A computational substrate for incentive salience. Trends in Neurosciences, 2003, 26(8): 423–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed S H, Koob G F. Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function. Psychopharmacology, 2005, 180(3): 473–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berridge K C, Robinson T E. Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 2003, 26(9): 507–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Redish A D, Jensen S, Johnson A, Kurth-Nelson Z. Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Review, 2007, 114(3): 784–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dezfouli A, Piray P, Keramati M M, Ekhtiari H, Lucas C, Mokri A. A neurocomputational model for cocaine addiction. Neural Computation, 2009, 21(10): 2869–2893

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Redish A D, Jensen S, Johnson A. A unified framework for addiction: vulnerabilities in the decision process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008, 31(4): 415–487

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daw N D, Niv Y, Dayan P. Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nature Neuroscience, 2005, 8(12): 1704–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Redish A D, Johnson A. A computational model of craving and obsession. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007, 1104(1): 324–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bickel W K, Yi R. Addiction science as a hedgehog and as a fox. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008, 31(4): 441–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed S H, Graupner M, Gutkin B. Computational approaches to the neurobiology of drug addiction. Pharmacopsychiatry, 2009, 42(Suppl 1): S144–S152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutkin B S, Dehaene S, Changeux J P. A neurocompu tational hypothesis for nicotine addiction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(4): 1106–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Becker G S, Murphy K M. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 1988, 96(4): 675–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernheim B D, Rangel A. Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 2004, 94(5): 1558–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Winick C. Maturing out of narcotic addiction. Bulletin on Narcotics, 1962, 14(1): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maddux J F, Desmond D P. New light on the maturing out hypothesis in opioid dependence. Bulletin on Narcotics, 1980, 32(1): 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  29. Waldorf D. Natural recovery from opiate addiction: some socio-psychological processes of untreated recovery. Journal of Drug Issues, 1983, 13(2): 237–280

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tucker J A. Different pathways to knowledge about different pathways to recovery: a comment on the people awakening study. Addiction, 2008, 103(2): 216–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alligood K T, Sauer T, Yorke J A. Chaos, An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  32. Leise T, Siegelmann H. Dynamics of a multistage circadian system. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 2006, 21(4): 314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rapatski B L, Suppe F, Yorke J A. HIV epidemics driven by late disease stage transmission. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2005, 38(3): 241–253

    Google Scholar 

  34. Olsen M M, Siegelmann-Danieli N, Siegelmann H T. Dynamic computational model suggests that cellular citizenship is fundamental for selective tumor apoptosis. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5(5): e10637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Glass L, Mackey MC. From Clocks to Chaos: The Rhythms of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Belair J, Glass L, An Der Heiden U, Milton J. Dynamical disease: identification, temporal aspects and treatment strategies of human illness. Chaos, 1995, 5(1): 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Siegelmann H T. Complex systems science and brain dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2010, 4(7): 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  38. Anthony J C, Warner L A, Kessler R C. Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the national comorbidity survey. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1994, 2(3): 244–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Cushman F, Hauser M, Damasio A. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 2007, 446(7138): 908–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Monterosso J, Ainslie G. The behavioral economics of will in recovery from addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2007, 90(Suppl 1): S100–S111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Niv Y, Joel D, Dayan P. A normative perspective on motivation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, 10(8): 375–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hava T. Siegelmann.

Additional information

Hava T. SIEGELMANN is an associate professor of Computer Science and Neuroscience at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and the director of the BINDS (Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems) laboratory. Dr. Siegelmann’s research focuses on mathematical modeling of biological systems with particular interest in memory, epigenetics, cellular development and disease evolution. Her research into biologically inspired memory and artificial intelligence has led to machine systems, which are more autonomous: capable of learning, tracking, clustering, associating, and inferring and are more robust and capable of operating in real-world environments. She introduced the highly utile Support Vector Clustering algorithm with Vladimir Vapnik and colleagues. Siegelmann’s seminal Turing machine equivalence of recurrent neural networks theorem and the super-Turing theory, which greatly impacted current thinking on computation, have found new utility in her work on machine memory reconsolidation and intelligent cellular function. Her work is often interdisciplinary, and combines methods from the fields of Complexity Science, Networks Theory, Dynamical Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Dynamical Health is Siegelmann’s recent thesis stating that an unbalanced dynamic is the cause of most systemic disorders, that returning the system to balance is extremely beneficial to healing and further, that it is too limiting to focus only on primary causes, when any treatment that returns balance is sufficient for healing. Modeling these systems mathematically provides a means of exploring many possible solutions, which can then be translated to actual treatment. Her recent system biology studies include genetic networks, circadian system, memory reconsolidation, miRNA, cancer, and now addiction. She remains active in supporting young researchers and encouraging minorities and women to enter and advance in the sciences.

About this article

Cite this article

Siegelmann, H.T. Addiction as a dynamical rationality disorder. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. China 6, 151–158 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0134-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0134-2

Keywords